Managing Information for and About Faculty
FREE Resources , Partners , SmarterFaculty , SmarterMeasure , SmarterServices , SmarterSurveys , Webinars
|
|
We are excited to announce our FREE Fall Webinar coming up on Tuesday, September 21st from 2:00-3:00 pm central. SmarterServices is partnering with Data180 and planning to provide 1 hour, jam-packed full of resources that help you manage your faculty and their information in a more useful, efficient way. A recent article in the Pearson eCollege newsletter, really brought home the concept of this webinar. Using faculty portfolios, technology, combining aspects of both, along with obtaining good evaluation data can result in a better assessment process and more useable information. Another key component according to the article is getting everyone involved in the process from ground up. Join us for the FREE webinar - Managing Information for and About Faculty - Space is limited so register today!
|
|
|
|||||||
|
August Issue:
SmarterServices
Gives Back
Do you have a great idea to improve SmarterMeasure? Follow us on Twitter!
FREE SmarterMeasure Training Series Do you need some training on the administrative features of SmarterMeasure? We provide bi-monthly 30 minute - FREE training sessions to all current clients. To view a calendar of opportunities and register, click here. |
||||||
| This email was sent to $contact_email1 by news@SmarterServices.com. You can unsubscribe your address by visiting http://smarterservices.com/optout.cfm?e=$contact_email1 SmarterServices | PO Box 220111, Deatsville AL 36022 |
|||||||
Now available to all current clients is SmarterMeasure in disaggregate mode. To learn more about how it works, register for our free webinar.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
SmarterMeasure Training Webinar - Using Disaggregate Mode |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Over the past decade the SmarterMeasure Learning Readiness Indicator has evolved based on client input as well as our analysis of the data received. Based on this feedback some revisions are being made to the learning styles section of the assessment.
RATIONALE FOR THE ENHANCEMENTS:
· Many schools are concerned about the length of the assessment so an abbreviated version is desired.
· The variability of the existing three-point scale used to measure learning styles can be improved by using a bipolar, four-point scale.
· The wording of the existing instrument can be improved because two constructs are mentioned in a single question in some instances.
WHAT CHANGES?
WHAT STAYS THE SAME?
NOTABLE IMPROVEMENTS - In consultation with our psychometrician, in addition to reducing the number of items from 35 to 21, we also made the following improvements to the learning styles assessment.
1. Item selection – To identify the twenty-one items to remain in the assessment a random sample of 39,000 records were pulled of persons who had completed the learning styles assessment over the past three month period. Means and standard deviations were calculated for each of the thirty-five items. Two of the five items per learning style with the lowest mean and broadest standard deviations were identified for deletion. The rationale is that the items with the lowest mean and broadest standard deviations were the least indicative of a person with that learning style as dominant.
2. Parallel statements - Items were rephrased so that they all begin with “You. …”
3. Expanded scale - The scale was increased form a three point scale to a four point scale. There are seven learning styles being measured on the scale. The prior version measured each of the seven types with five statements. In this revised version of the instrument each of the seven learning styles is measured with three items. To accommodate for the reduced number of items the three-point scale was increased to a four-point scale. The research literature on personality inventories indicates that a bi-polar (even number of items on the scale) is preferred over a scale with a mid-point (odd number of items). Using an odd-numbered scaled with a mid-point persons are likely to choose the middle or neutral option. But with a four-point scale they have to choose an option on the positive or negative side of the scale.
4. Item clarity – Some of the prior items were stated in such a way that more than one idea was being presented in the statement. All statements have now been revised so that only one idea is communicated in each statement.
5. Item order – To ensure that items on the assessment were not grouped by learning style the statements are arranged alphabetically.
Recent Comments